When dopamine and volume aren’t enough, the choice comes down to two catecholamines — epinephrine and norepinephrine. Same family, very different jobs. Choosing well means treating the physiology, not the number on the monitor.
Match the drug to the lesion. Epinephrine is the inotrope-plus-pressor for a failing pump (cold shock, myocardial depression); norepinephrine is the selective vasopressor for a dilated circulation (warm shock). Define whether the problem is pump or tone before you reach for either.
01 Two catecholamines, two profiles
Both are endogenous catecholamines acting directly on adrenergic receptors, but their receptor selectivity sets them apart at the bedside.
02 Choose by the lesion, not the number
Selecting between these potent agents means defining the exact cardiovascular pathology rather than treating a blood-pressure value.
Low SVR, high output. After volume and a first inotrope, norepinephrine is added to restore lost systemic vascular resistance.5,2
Low output, myocardial depression. Epinephrine is favoured for its direct inotropic action; paediatric guidance starts adrenaline and shifts to noradrenaline if shock is vasodilatory.5
After perinatal asphyxia with myocardial depression, epinephrine is a potent rescue to restore contractility. Avoid where there is dynamic outflow obstruction (HOCM) (expert consensus).
Epinephrine can support a failing right ventricle, but use it cautiously in the severely hypoxaemic infant — its α effects can raise pulmonary vascular resistance and worsen right-to-left shunting.2
03 The price of potency — metabolic & structural risks
Both agents are powerfully vasoactive and carry real cost, which is a large part of why they are held in reserve.
Strongly linked to hyperglycaemia and hyperlactataemia — it drives glycogenolysis and glycolysis while α-mediated vasoconstriction promotes anaerobic metabolism and lactate.3,7,8
Tachycardia and tachyarrhythmia raise myocardial oxygen demand and oxidative stress; sustained high-dose catecholamine exposure is cardiotoxic.3
Its intense vasoconstriction can compromise regional and organ tissue perfusion in some infants, even as blood pressure rises.2
04 What actually happens at the cot-side
Paediatric septic-shock guidance increasingly favours epinephrine or norepinephrine over dopamine as first-line support5 — yet neonatal practice stays conservative, with dopamine still the usual first choice.1,2
In a cross-sectional survey of Indian Level III NICUs, for sepsis-induced hypotension dopamine was the preferred first-line inotrope, followed by norepinephrine and low-dose epinephrine — while norepinephrine, followed by dobutamine, was the preferred second-line agent.1 In neonatal septic shock specifically, a pilot randomised trial found norepinephrine comparable to adrenaline for resolving shock and for mortality.5
References
- Das R, Nagpal R, Deshpande S, et al. A survey on management practices of hypotension in preterm neonates: an Indian perspective. Front Pediatr. 2024;12:1411719. doi.org/10.3389/fped.2024.1411719
- Wu TW, Noori S. Recognition and management of neonatal hemodynamic compromise. Pediatr Neonatol. 2021;62(Suppl 1):S22–S29. doi.org/10.1016/j.pedneo.2020.12.007
- Jha A, Zilahi G, Rhodes A. Vasoactive therapy in shock. BJA Educ. 2021;21(7):270–277. doi.org/10.1016/j.bjae.2021.03.002
- Garvey AA, Kooi EMW, Dempsey EM. Inotropes for preterm infants: 50 years on are we any wiser? Front Pediatr. 2018;6:88. doi.org/10.3389/fped.2018.00088
- Garegrat R, Patnaik S, Suryawanshi S, et al. A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing noradrenaline and adrenaline as a first-line vasopressor for fluid-refractory septic shock in neonates. Front Pediatr. 2024;12:1443990. doi.org/10.3389/fped.2024.1443990
- Lu P, Sun Y, Gong X, et al. Use of norepinephrine in preterm neonates with dopamine-resistant shock: a retrospective single-centre cross-sectional study. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2023;7(1):e001804. doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2022-001804
- Myburgh JA. Norepinephrine: more of a neurohormone than a vasopressor. Crit Care. 2010;14(5):196. doi.org/10.1186/cc9246
- Boscarino G, Conti MG, Esposito S, et al. Pharmacological hypotensive treatment in very preterm newborns: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Acta Paediatr. 2025. doi.org/10.1111/apa.70411
Educational summary for clinicians and trainees. Referenced to primary sources; items marked expert consensus reflect standard practice rather than trial evidence. Doses are for orientation only — always follow your unit’s formulary and senior review. This supports, and does not replace, local guidelines and individualised clinical judgement.

